Friday, January 31, 2014

The Roman Empire, Corrupt Politics, and Monsanto

While reading a section of the Satyricon (a piece published during the Roman empire that gives us a glimpse of the the extravagance of wealthy Romans), I found myself wondering if this is how the Waltons live.  According to Forbes, six members of the Walton family (founders of Wal-Mart) have more worth than the bottom 30% of all Americans put together

I also found myself pondering, not for the first time, the ways in which our 21st century society is like the Roman Empire of 2,000 years ago.  In my history classes, we always studied the Roman Empire as a great democracy making leaps toward modern civilization, but the disparity of wealth and increasingly-corrupt politics brought it down.  Are we headed in the same direction?  According to this article, "8 Striking parallels between the U.S. and the Roman Empire," history is not on our side! 

Here's one example: In reading Food Politics and watching the documentary Food Inc., I've become more aware of the problem of the "revolving door politics."  Our government officials are funded by companies, sometimes companies they've worked for, and they often protect their own interests and their companies instead of using their government position to protect citizens.  See examples below.

This was also a problem in ancient Rome.  According to 8 Striking parallels between the U.S. and the Roman Empire: Politics as the Road to Personal Wealth, "During the late Roman Republic period, one of the main roads to wealth was holding public office, and exploiting such positions to accumulate personal wealth."  

"Lawrence Lessig’s Republic Lost documents the corrosive effect of money on our political process. Lessig persuasively makes the case that we are witnessing the loss of our republican form of government, as politicians increasingly represent those who fund their campaigns, rather than our citizens." 

According to Lessig, Congressman, Senators and their staffs leverage their government service to move to private sector positions – that pay three to ten times their government compensation. Given this financial arrangement, “Their focus is therefore not so much on the people who sent them to Washington. Their focus is instead on those who will make them rich.”

I find this pretty disturbing...anyone agree?!? 

4 comments:

  1. Of course I find this disturbing!! I've never made the comparison between the collapsing Roman Empire and the collapsing American Republic. That link you put up kinda says it all. It's a real shame the supreme court ruled money a form of free speech and corporations as people...if those court decisions went the other way we might've done our country a whole lot of good. Lawrence Lessig has a great TED Talk about "reclaiming the republic". If you haven't seen it, here's the link:
    http://www.ted.com/talks/lessig_nyed.html

    ReplyDelete
  2. I liked the roman empire/ us comparison a lot as well, it is very easy to see the resemblance. I liked when he said "their focus instead is on those who will make them rich" basically defines our whole government to the T. I thought this was written well :)

    ReplyDelete
  3. I never thought of comparing us to the roman empire but it fits and makes a lot of sense.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I don't think human nature has changed since the days of the roman empire, I think it's a great comparison.

    ReplyDelete